Cultural Sociology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goode, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Cultural Sociology, Vol. 1, No. 3, 365-382 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1749975507082055
© 2007 SAGE Publications and the British Sociological Association

Whose Collection Is It Anyway? An Autoethnographic Account of `Dividing the Spoils' upon Divorce

Jackie Goode

University of Nottingham, jackie.goode{at}nottingham.ac.uk

This article examines competing meanings assigned to collections / collected objects when spouses divorce. An approach to material culture that privileges the mundane and sensual qualities of artefacts as well as their symbolic meanings enables the unpicking of the subtle connections with cultural lives and values that are objectified through such forms. The article illustrates both the way meanings assigned to collected objects can be multiple and shifting, and the ways in which they are constitutive of relationships: between collecting practices, collections, and collector; between `things' and `home'; and, as issues of ownership become contested upon divorce, between spouses. It suggests that, in this case at least, collected objects are also constitutive of class and gender relations. Barnard talked of a `his marriage' and a `her marriage'. This is a `herstor y' of the making, and keeping, of three collections, and of their significance in the parting of spouses and the reconstitution of home(s) post-divorce.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?