This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hennion, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Those Things That Hold Us Together: Taste and Sociology

École des Mines de Paris, France

The idea of reflexivity has much to offer to the analysis of taste - but reflexivity in its ancient sense, a form neither active nor passive, pointing to an originary state where things, persons, and events have just arrived, with no action, subject or objects yet decided. Objects of taste are not present, inert, available and at our service.They give themselves up, they shy away, they impose themselves. ‘Amateurs’ do not believe things have taste. On the contrary, they make themselves detect them, through a continuous elaboration of procedures that put taste to the test. Understood as reflexive work performed on one’s own attachments, the amateur’s taste is no longer considered (as with so-called ‘critical’ sociology) an arbitrary election which has to be explained by hidden social causes. Rather, it is a collective technique, whose analysis helps us to understand the ways we make ourselves sensitized, to things, to ourselves, to situations and to moments, while simultaneously controlling how those feelings might be shared and discussed with others.

Key Words: amateurs • attachment • pragmatism • reflexivity • sociology • taste

References

• Ashmore, Malcolm (1989) The Reflexive Thesis. Wrighting (sic) Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Beck, Ulrich, Giddens, Anthony and Lash, Scott (1994) Reflexive Modernization. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Benvéniste, Émile (1966) Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.
• Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor Books.
• Boltanski, Luc and Thévenot, Laurent (1991) De la justification. Les économies de la grandeur. Paris: Gallimard.
• Bourdieu, Pierre (1984) Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Callon, Michel (1986) ‘Some Elements For A Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St-Brieuc Bay’ in John Law (ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, pp. 196-229. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
• Callon, Michel (1992) ‘Sociologie des sciences et économie du changement technique: l’irrésistible montée des réseaux technico-économiques’, in CSI (ed.) Ces réseaux que la raison ignore, pp. 53-78. Paris: L’Harmattan.
• de Certeau, Michel (1981) ‘Croire: une pratique de la différence. Documents, Centro Internazionale di Semiotica e di Linguistica’, Università di Urbino (106- A, Septembre): 1-21.
• Clifford, James and Marcus, G. E. (eds) (1986) Writing Culture. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnographic. Berkekey, CA: University of California Press.
• Conein, Bernard, Dodier, Nicolas and Thévenot, Laurent (1993) ‘Les objets dans l’action’, Raisons pratiques 4. Paris: Éd. de l’ÉHÉSS.
• DeNora, Tia (2000) Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Garfinkel, Harold (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Geertz, Clifford (1996) Ici et là-bas. Paris: Métailié.
• Gomart, Émilie (1999) ‘Surprised by Methadone: Experiments in Substitution’. PhD thesis, CSI-École des Mines, Paris.
• Gomart, Émilie and Hennion, Antoine (1999) ‘A Sociology of Attachment: Music Lovers, Drug Addicts’, in John Law and John Hassard (eds) Actor Network Theory and After, pp. 220-247. Oxford/Malden: Blackwell.
• Hennion, Antoine (2004) ‘Pragmatics of Taste’, in Mark Jacobs and Nancy Hanrahan (eds) The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Culture, pp. 131-144. Oxford/Malden: Blackwell.
• Hennion, Antoine, Maisonneuve, Sophie and Gomart, Émilie (2000) Figures de l’amateur. Formes, objets, pratiques de l’amour de la musique aujourd’hui. Paris: La Documentation française/DEP-Ministère de la Culture.
• Hennion, Antoine and Teil, Geneviève (2004) ’Le goût du vin. Pour une sociologie de l’attention’, in Véronique Nahoum-Grappe and Odile Vincent (eds) Le goût des belles choses, pp. 111-26. Paris: Éditions de la MSH.
• James, William (1996 [NY, 1912]) Essays in Radical Empiricism. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
• Latour, Bruno (1991) Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. Paris: La Découverte.
• Latour, Bruno (2000) ‘Factures/fractures. De la notion de réseau à celle d’attachement. Ce qui nous relie’, in André Micoud and Michel Peroni (eds) La Tour d’Aigues, pp. 189-208. Éditions de l’Aube.
• Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1964) Le visible et l’invisible. Paris: Gallimard.
• Serres, Michel (1985) Les cinq sens. Philosophie des corps mêlés. Paris: Grasset.
• Suchman, Lucy A. (1987) Plans and Situated Actions. The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Thévenot, Laurent (1990) ‘L’action qui convient. Les formes de l’action’, Raisons pratiques 1: 39-69.
• Woolgar, Steve (1988) Knowledge and Refexivity. New Frontiers in the Sciology of Knowledge. London: Sage.

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hennion, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?